This review delves into the Brooks C67 Cambium saddle, a widely advertised saddle promising instant comfort and suitability for upright riding positions. The reviewer, a daily commuter, purchased the saddle with high expectations, drawn to its wide design and Brooks' renowned reputation. However, this experience proved to be far from the idyllic commute the marketing suggested. This review will explore the significant discrepancies between the advertised comfort and the reviewer's actual experience, highlighting key issues encountered during a week-long test.The review examines not only the comfort aspects but also the structural integrity of the saddle. Issues with a creaking sound emanating from the plastic mounting point and the lack of secure attachment to the metal rails are discussed. Furthermore, the impact of clothing choices on the overall comfort level will be analyzed, comparing the saddle's performance with padded cycling shorts versus regular clothing worn during a daily commute. Ultimately, the review provides a comprehensive assessment of the Brooks C67 Cambium, considering its performance, build quality, and value for money, offering valuable insights for potential buyers.
Pros And Cons
- Looks fantastic, streamlined and slim profile
- Not terribly heavy
- Comfortable with thick padded cycling pants
- Weatherproof
- Uncomfortable for daily commuting in regular jeans
- Plastic mount moves around, creaks, and has significant free play
- Uncomfortable in an upright riding position
- Expensive ($120)
- Plastic coating on rails chipped during saddle tightening
Read more: The 5 Best Bike Saddles for Triathlons
Initial Expectations vs. Reality
I initially had high hopes for the Brooks C67 Cambium saddle. Advertised as instantly comfortable and ideal for upright riding positions, it seemed perfect for my daily commute. The wide design, the largest in Brooks' Cambium line, was also a major draw. However, my week-long experience proved far less idyllic.

The promised cloud-like comfort was absent. Instead, I found the saddle uncomfortable from the outset. This wasn't a matter of break-in period; the discomfort was immediate and persistent.

This stark contrast between marketing and reality was disappointing. My expectations were high given Brooks' reputation, and the initial excitement quickly waned.

Build Quality Issues: Creaking and Movement
A significant problem was the saddle's creaking. The plastic mounting point moved, creating a persistent and distracting noise throughout my rides. This wasn't a simple tightening issue; it was a design flaw.

The plastic bracket wasn't securely attached to the metal rails, leading to considerable play. This movement exacerbated the discomfort and added to the overall negative experience.

This lack of structural integrity is unacceptable, especially for a saddle at this price point. I would expect a far higher standard of build quality from a renowned brand like Brooks.

Comfort Concerns: Clothing and Riding Position
The advertised comfort seems geared towards cyclists wearing padded cycling shorts. In my daily commute, wearing regular jeans and underwear, the saddle was excruciatingly uncomfortable.

The hard rubber material, combined with the lack of padding and my regular clothing, caused chafing and pressure points. This rendered the saddle unsuitable for my typical riding style.

The saddle's design seems better suited to a more aggressive riding posture. My upright commuting position amplified the discomfort, making long rides unbearable.

Final Verdict and Alternatives
Ultimately, the Brooks C67 Cambium saddle failed to meet my expectations. The discomfort, creaking, and poor build quality outweigh the aesthetically pleasing design and weatherproof qualities.

For a daily commuter who wears regular clothes, I strongly advise against this saddle. The high price point doesn't justify the lack of comfort and structural issues.

I've returned to my inexpensive stock saddle, which provides far superior comfort. The Brooks C67 might suit casual riders using padded shorts, but for daily commuting, it's a poor choice.