Brooks Cambium C17 Saddle Review: Comfort, Width, and Cutout Comparison

This review delves into the Brooks Cambium C17 saddle, exploring its comfort, width options, and the key differences between the cutout and non-cutout models. We examine the saddle's performance across various riding styles and body types, considering its suitability for different cyclists. Particular attention is paid to the saddle's unique design features, including its non-flat profile and the recommended upward tilt, along with a discussion of its overall build quality and aesthetic appeal. The review also considers the impact of the saddle's width on rider positioning and comfort levels.This comprehensive assessment provides a balanced perspective on the Brooks Cambium C17, weighing its pros and cons for long-distance riding and competitive cycling. We share personal experiences with both the cutout and non-cutout versions, highlighting the comfort differences and offering insights into potential fitting issues. Ultimately, this review aims to help readers decide if the Brooks Cambium C17 is the right saddle for their individual needs and riding style, emphasizing the importance of proper bike fitting in achieving optimal comfort and performance.

Pros And Cons

Read more: The 5 Best Bike Saddles for Triathlons

Overall Comfort and Design

The Brooks Cambium C17 is generally very comfortable. Its wider seat and soft, vulcanized rubber effectively absorb road vibrations, resulting in a smooth ride. The saddles are available in a narrow (C17) version, approximately 167mm wide, making them suitable for various bike types.

Both the cutout and non-cutout models are the same width. A narrower C15 model (around 155mm) is also available and might be better suited for road bikes. The steel rails contribute to the saddle's weight, making it less ideal for racing.

Width and Forward Sliding Issue

I personally found the 167mm width to be a bit too wide for my preference. This caused me to slide forward on the saddle, an issue experienced with both models.

This sliding could be due to the saddle's width, resulting in an improper seating position that pushed me forward. Improved leg movement might be another factor contributing to this problem.

Cutout vs. Non-Cutout Models: A Detailed Comparison

The primary difference between the two models is the cutout. The cutout model exhibits significantly more give in the rubber due to the central relief.

Surprisingly, I found the non-cutout model to be more comfortable. The cutout caused my soft tissue to sink in, leading to discomfort. My personal preference leans towards the non-cutout version.

Saddle Level and Brooks' Recommendation

An interesting aspect is the saddle's non-flat profile. When level, it has a noticeable dip in the middle. Brooks recommends tilting the saddle upward slightly.

I found this recommendation unusual, as typical bike fitting suggests a level or slightly forward-tilted nose. While I don't fully understand Brooks' reasoning, the upward tilt does appear aesthetically odd.

Material and Build Quality

The vulcanized rubber offers a unique texture, slightly abrasive but not problematic. The saddle's edges have a slightly frayed look, seemingly a factory characteristic rather than damage.

Overall, the saddle is well-made with a nice aesthetic. The rivets add a cool touch, and the rear logo adds to its overall appeal. The saddle also includes mounting points.

Final Verdict and Recommendations

The Brooks Cambium C17 is a comfortable saddle, especially the non-cutout model, offered at a good price point ($100-$130 USD). However, its weight and flexibility might not be ideal for competitive cyclists.

I highly recommend the non-cutout model for long-distance riding. Consider trying the narrower C15 model for a potentially better fit. Always prioritize proper bike fitting before choosing a saddle.