Brooks B17 vs. Tioga Spyder: A Comfortable Bike Saddle Showdown

Choosing the right bike saddle can significantly impact your cycling experience, and the Brooks B17 and Tioga Spyder represent two distinct approaches to comfort and performance. This comparative review pits these popular saddles against each other, exploring their key differences in design, materials, and overall feel. One is a legendary leather saddle renowned for its long-term comfort and adjustability, while the other offers a lighter, more affordable alternative with a firm, consistent support system. We delve into the nuances of each, examining how they perform under different conditions and with various cycling attire.This head-to-head comparison will help you determine which saddle best suits your needs. We examine the initial feel, break-in period, adjustability features, and weight differences between the Brooks B17 Imperial and the Tioga Spyder. Ultimately, the choice between these two saddles hinges on personal preferences, riding style, and budget. This review aims to provide a clear and comprehensive understanding of the pros and cons of each, empowering you to make an informed decision for a more comfortable and enjoyable ride.

Pros And Cons

Brooks B-17 Saddle
  • Adjustable tightness via laces allows for customized firmness.
  • More comfortable with jeans.
  • Heavier than the Spider.
  • More expensive
Spider T Agra Saddle
  • Lightweight (approximately four pounds).
  • Little difference in comfort with padded cycling shorts.
  • Can be hard initially, though it might soften over time.
  • Made of plastic; less likely to conform to rider's sit bones than leather.

Read more: The 5 Best Bike Saddles for Triathlons

Initial Impressions and Acquisition

My journey began with the Brooks B17 Imperial, a renowned saddle known for its comfort and durability. However, its 12-week delivery time led me to explore alternatives. This is where the Tioga Spyder (a purported Brooks knockoff) entered the picture. Weighing in at a mere four pounds, it was significantly lighter than the Brooks.

Close-up of the Brooks B17 Imperial saddle.
Close-up of the Brooks B17 Imperial saddle.

The Brooks B17 was my initial choice, mainly because of its reputation. The long wait, however, prompted me to buy the Tioga Spyder as a temporary solution. I wanted to compare these two saddles side by side to understand their differences.

The lighter Tioga Spyder saddle being held up for comparison.
The lighter Tioga Spyder saddle being held up for comparison.

Both saddles aim for similar support methods; both utilize a hammock-style design for pressure distribution. The initial feeling of the two saddles are surprisingly different.

Comfort and Material Comparison

The Brooks B17, with its leather construction, offers a unique comfort experience. While initially firm, it softens over time, molding to your body. The leather provides a natural give and supports your sit bones.

Close-up showing the flexible leather of the Brooks B17.
Close-up showing the flexible leather of the Brooks B17.

In contrast, the Tioga Spyder's plastic construction remains firm. It doesn't break in like the leather of the Brooks, maintaining its stiffness over time. While supportive due to its rigid material, this consistency is less adaptable.

Close-up highlighting the rigid plastic of the Tioga Spyder.
Close-up highlighting the rigid plastic of the Tioga Spyder.

With jeans, the Brooks felt slightly more comfortable; the supple leather conformed better. With padded cycling shorts, however, the difference is significantly less noticeable.

Both saddles shown side-by-side for comparison.
Both saddles shown side-by-side for comparison.

Adjustability and Weight

The Brooks B17 features adjustable laces, allowing you to fine-tune the tension and firmness of the saddle. This customizability significantly impacts comfort and support.

The laces of the Brooks B17, demonstrating adjustability.
The laces of the Brooks B17, demonstrating adjustability.

The Tioga Spyder lacks such adjustability. Its fixed shape determines its fit. The Brooks is heavier, but allows for a far more precise fit.

Comparing the width and shape of both saddles.
Comparing the width and shape of both saddles.

The weight difference is substantial. The Tioga Spyder's lightweight design is a major advantage, particularly for long rides or if your bike is stolen, which is something to consider.

Side-by-side weight comparison of the two saddles.
Side-by-side weight comparison of the two saddles.

Conclusion and Recommendation

The Brooks B17 Imperial provides superior comfort, especially for longer rides and when wearing jeans. Its adjustable laces offer a customized fit. However, it is far heavier and more expensive.

Concluding shot, showcasing both saddles together.
Concluding shot, showcasing both saddles together.

The Tioga Spyder's lightweight and affordable design makes it a great option for shorter rides and those who prefer a firmer, less adaptable seat. The comfort difference is minimized with padded cycling shorts.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual preferences, riding style, clothing, and budget. Both saddles have their strengths; the Brooks offers superior comfort and adjustability, while the Tioga excels in weight and affordability.