This review dives into the Zefal Trail 65 mudguards, evaluating their performance and value. We'll explore the ease of installation, the quality of the included components, and the effectiveness of these mudguards in protecting against mud and spray. We'll also examine the packaging, design, and overall build quality, highlighting both the pros and cons based on real-world usage. Particular attention will be paid to the advertised width versus actual measurements, a crucial factor for potential buyers.This in-depth assessment considers the mudguards' suitability for various bike types and riding styles, from casual commutes to more challenging trail rides. We'll discuss the necessary adjustments for optimal performance and the potential need for modifications depending on your specific bike and riding conditions. Ultimately, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis to help you decide if the Zefal Trail 65 mudguards are the right choice for your cycling needs.
Pros And Cons
- Minimalistic design
- Slide-on cardboard packaging
- Compatible with V-brakes
- Includes extra zip ties and rubber sleeves
- Slippery inside to prevent mud build-up
- Actual width is narrower than advertised (62-64 mm instead of 65 mm)
- Potential for rattling in the back
- Rubber ring mentioned in manual is missing
Read more: 5 Best Child Bike Fenders to Keep Your Little One Dry
Unboxing and Package Contents
The Zefal Trail 65 mudguards arrived in minimal, eco-friendly packaging – a simple cardboard slide-on, which is a plus. This reduces waste and makes for a pleasant unboxing experience. Inside, I found everything needed for installation: two mudguards, three zip ties (one extra!), two rubber sleeves for the zip ties, two long bolts, one shorter bolt, two nuts, and two washers. The absence of excessive plastic is appreciated.
The included instructions were somewhat lacking. One notable component - a rubber ring - was mentioned in the manual but was not present in the box. This omission leaves its intended purpose a mystery.
Construction and Design
The mudguards themselves are lightweight and feature a sleek, minimalistic design. The construction seems sturdy, using a smooth plastic that should repel mud effectively. The internal surface is very slippery to prevent mud build-up. A small wire is included for securing the rear fender, a thoughtful touch for extra stability. Some users have reported rattling issues with the rear fender; a simple fix involves wedging something between the wire and the fender to eliminate vibrations.
The manufacturer claims a 65mm width, but actual measurements are slightly smaller (around 62-64mm). This discrepancy is disappointing, particularly for those relying on the advertised dimensions.
Installation and Fit on a Full Suspension Bike
The Zefal Trail 65 mudguards are designed for easy installation. The included zip ties and hardware make mounting straightforward. The manufacturer's suggested positioning works well for hardtails. However, for full-suspension bikes, some adjustments may be necessary to ensure optimal coverage and prevent mud splatter. I've decided to use the mudguards as is for the winter, potentially extending them later with zip ties to reach the chainstays.
An important consideration is the mudguard's interaction with the bike's suspension. My previous experience with a straight-line fender revealed the drawbacks. Such designs tend to interfere with the suspension travel, potentially damaging the paintwork. Hence, the flexibility of the Zefal mudguards is valuable, and adjustments to fit are preferable over a rigid, straight design.
Final Verdict
Overall, the Zefal Trail 65 mudguards offer a decent level of protection and are easy to install. The lightweight design and minimal packaging are commendable. However, the discrepancy between the advertised width and the actual measurements is a significant drawback. While they work adequately for winter use, they might not provide ideal protection for all tire sizes. I would still consider them a good option for those who prefer minimalistic mudguards and are willing to make minor adjustments for a more snug fit.
The minimalistic design, however, is both its strength and weakness. While keeping weight and overall aesthetics to a minimum, the reduced width might not suffice for all riders or trail conditions. It's a good option for someone looking for a lightweight solution for mild riding conditions. For more aggressive trail riding or harsher conditions, additional modifications might be necessary. Consider the actual width before purchasing to ensure compatibility with your needs.
