The XOSS G2+ GPS cycle computer promises a significant upgrade over its predecessor, boasting enhanced battery life and a wealth of new features. This review delves into the details of this feature-packed device, exploring its strengths and weaknesses to determine whether it's a worthwhile investment for cyclists of all levels. We'll examine its improved GPS acquisition speed, expanded data display, and intuitive navigation system. But we'll also scrutinize potential drawbacks such as a potentially cluttered interface and reported sensor inconsistencies.This in-depth analysis considers the G2+'s build quality, screen readability, and overall usability. We'll weigh the benefits of its increased data metrics against the potential drawbacks of a less clean display and the impact of the glossy finish. Ultimately, this review aims to provide a balanced perspective, helping you decide if the XOSS G2+ is the right GPS cycle computer for your needs, or if the original model remains a superior choice.
Read more: Garmin Edge 530 Review: Best Value GPS Bike Computer?
Unboxing and First Impressions
The XOSS G2+ arrived, promising enhanced battery life and additional features compared to its predecessor. The packaging was clean and simple, and the device itself felt solid and well-built. Initial impressions were positive; the slightly larger screen promised improved readability.
Powering on the unit was straightforward, a long press of the right-hand button initiated the startup sequence. The device quickly connected to the GPS satellites, noticeably faster than the previous model. This improved speed is a welcome enhancement for impatient cyclists.
The overall design is trapezoidal, slightly thicker than the previous generation, and features glossy sides. While functional, the glossier finish might attract more fingerprints and scratches compared to the matte finish of the older model.
Improved Features and Functionality
The G2+ boasts a significant increase in displayed data. Beyond the standard speed, distance, and time, it now shows calories burned, elevation gain/loss, average speed, and even a VAM (Vertical Ascent Rate) reading. This wealth of information caters to cyclists who want in-depth metrics.
Navigation through the various data pages is intuitive, accomplished by short presses of the right button. The clear display layout, even with the increased data, makes it relatively easy to find the specific information needed during a ride. It also supports sensor connectivity, such as speed, cadence, and heart rate sensors.
The improved GPS acquisition speed is a highlight; significantly faster than the first-generation XOSS device, this is a major advantage for riders who value quick start-up and minimal wait times.
Drawbacks and Design Considerations
While the increased data is useful, the display can feel somewhat cluttered. The sheer amount of information may make it difficult to quickly focus on key metrics during intense rides. The smaller clock at the top of the display is a minor, but noticeable, reduction in size compared to the previous model.
Inconsistent sensor readings, particularly with the cadence sensor, were reported. Spikes in cadence readings beyond what is physically possible indicate potential calibration or accuracy issues. This requires attention before relying on these data points.
The glossy finish, while aesthetically pleasing to some, is a fingerprint magnet. The design tradeoff needs to be weighed against potential usability issues for cyclists who need the device to be easy to read and manage.
Conclusion: Is the XOSS G2+ Worth the Upgrade?
The XOSS G2+ offers a noticeable upgrade over its predecessor, particularly in terms of battery life, GPS speed, and the wealth of data it displays. The added features provide valuable insights for serious cyclists who want to track their progress in detail.
However, the cluttered display and potential sensor inaccuracies present some drawbacks. The increased information density might overwhelm some users, and the reported cadence sensor issues need to be addressed. The design choices are subjective; some might prefer the glossier look, while others might find the matte finish of the original model more practical.
Ultimately, the decision to upgrade depends on individual priorities. If a longer-lasting battery and access to a broader array of data metrics are essential, then the G2+ is worth considering. Yet, if a cleaner, less cluttered interface and flawless sensor readings are paramount, the original XOSS device might remain the better option.