This review delves into the Garmin Edge 530, a GPS cycling computer, examining its features, performance, and overall user experience. We compare it directly to the Garmin Edge 810, a previous generation model, highlighting both similarities and key differences. The review covers aspects from initial unboxing and setup to real-world performance during cycling, assessing accuracy, screen quality, and responsiveness. Particular attention is paid to the device's Bluetooth connectivity, a crucial aspect impacting the overall user experience.The analysis considers build quality, ease of use, and data accuracy, providing a balanced perspective on the 530's strengths and weaknesses. We explore whether the Edge 530 justifies its price point compared to its predecessor and competing devices on the market, considering factors such as the absence of a touchscreen. Ultimately, this review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment to help cyclists determine if the Garmin Edge 530 is the right cycling computer for their needs.
Pros And Cons
- Amazing build quality
- Very bright LCD screen, visible in different light conditions
- Charging port on the back allows charging while riding
- Pairing issues with smartphones (Bluetooth connectivity problems)
- Non-touchscreen interface
Read more: Garmin Edge 530 Review: Best Value GPS Bike Computer?
Unboxing and First Impressions
The Garmin Edge 530 arrived in pristine condition, the packaging was simple yet elegant. The device itself is sleek and compact, promising ease of use and integration with my bike.

Inside, I found the device, a bar mount, a USB charging cable, and extra mounts for various bike types. The instruction manual was thorough, though I found the device pretty intuitive to set up.

Initial inspection revealed a high-quality build. The screen looks sharp and bright, which is crucial for readability in various lighting conditions while cycling.

Comparison with Garmin Edge 810
I've been a long-time user of the Garmin Edge 810, so a direct comparison was inevitable. The 530 feels incredibly similar in size and build.

The screen sizes are practically identical, offering a similar viewing experience. The 810, however, has a slightly thicker profile.

Both devices offer impressive performance, although my experience with the 810 suggests a longer battery life, especially during extended rides, like my 10-hour century ride.
Pairing and Connectivity Issues
One significant drawback of the 530 was the frustrating pairing process with my smartphone. I spent over an hour trying to resolve connectivity issues.

The Bluetooth connection consistently failed, despite having updated both my phone's operating system and the Garmin Connect app. This contrasts sharply with the seamless pairing of my older 810.

This pairing problem is apparently a widespread issue based on my research on Garmin forums, suggesting a potential design flaw with the 530's Bluetooth module.

Field Test and Performance
During the field test, both the 530 and 810 displayed similar accuracy, although my 810, paired with cadence and speed sensors, offered slightly more precise data.

The 530's screen brightness and clarity were excellent. The responsiveness was smooth.

Overall, the 530's performance was satisfactory; however, the lack of a touchscreen is noticeable, especially compared to my 810, making some navigation less convenient.

Conclusion: Garmin Edge 530 - Worth the Purchase?
The Garmin Edge 530 boasts impressive build quality, a bright and clear LCD display, and a convenient charging port. The device performs well during rides, offering accurate data.

However, the significant Bluetooth pairing problems during setup are a major letdown, especially for a device in this price range. The lack of a touchscreen also feels like a step backward in comparison to many competitors.
Considering the connectivity issues and lack of a touchscreen, I believe the older Garmin Edge 810 remains a superior choice. Unless those specific issues are addressed in future updates, the 530's value proposition is significantly weakened.