The Bont Vaypor XC cycling shoe promises exceptional performance, boasting a lightweight design, impressive power transfer, and durable construction. This comprehensive review delves into the key features and user experience, offering a balanced perspective on its strengths and weaknesses. We explore the critical aspect of fit, highlighting both the positive aspects of the heat-moldable carbon fiber sole and the significant limitations posed by the narrow fit and restricted availability of wider sizes.This review examines the comfort and adjustability of the Vaypor XC, including a detailed account of modifications made to improve the fit. We also discuss the shoe's longevity and the ease of repairing or replacing components. Ultimately, we aim to provide a realistic assessment of the Bont Vaypor XC, enabling potential buyers to make an informed decision based on their individual foot shape and access to appropriate sizing options.
Pros And Cons
- Good stiffness
- Good power transfer
- Lightweight
- Feels fast
- Replaceable straps and buckles
- Durable
- Heat moldable for customization
- Secure fit
- Too narrow
- Limited availability of wide sizes in Australia
Read more: 5 Best Vibram Cycling Shoes: A Buyer's Guide
Buckle System and Fit Issues
The Bont Vaypor XC shoes initially presented a challenge with their buckle system. While the ratchets offered a secure hold, they dug into my feet, causing discomfort. To address this, I replaced the original ratchets with those from a Giant shoe, resulting in a more flush and low-profile fit, significantly reducing the pinching sensation.
The shoe's narrow fit proved to be a major issue. Despite the excellent stiffness, ideal for power transfer, the narrow design made them uncomfortable for my feet. This highlights a key limitation: the lack of wider sizing options readily available in my region.
The comparison between the Bont Vaypor XC and a wider shoe underscores this issue. The narrower, more pointy toe box of the Bont shoe noticeably restricts foot movement, which is a significant drawback for many cyclists.
Customization and Availability
The limited availability of wide-fit Bont Vaypor XC shoes in Australia is a considerable drawback. This necessitates sourcing them from the US, adding to the inconvenience and cost. The inability to easily find the desired size and fit significantly impacts the overall user experience.
To improve comfort, I plan to acquire wider fit shoes from the US. The current pair will be given away due to the narrow fit. This speaks to the need for the manufacturer to improve the accessibility of wider sizes in various regions.
While the initial fit is problematic, the shoe does allow for some degree of customization. Replacing the ratchets and modifying the shoe itself offers potential improvements.
Performance and Durability
Despite the fit issues, the power transfer and overall feel are positive aspects of the shoe. The lightweight construction and responsive feel contribute to a fast riding experience.
The durability of the Bont Vaypor XC is noteworthy. The robust build and replaceable components (buckles and straps) contribute to a long lifespan. Minor repairs, such as restitching or regluing, can further extend the shoe’s usability.
The carbon fiber sole provides excellent stiffness and wraps around the foot, ensuring a secure and customized fit. The heat-moldable nature of the shoe allows for personalized adjustments.
Overall Conclusion and Recommendation
The Bont Vaypor XC shoes offer a strong performance experience with excellent power transfer, lightweight design, and durability. However, the narrow fit is a significant limitation that prevents a broader recommendation. The lack of readily available wider sizes is a major drawback.
For cyclists with narrow feet, the Bont Vaypor XC shoes could be an excellent choice, offering a high level of performance. However, the customization options (like replacing ratchets and widening) can mitigate the issues, but this adds extra effort and potentially expense.
Overall, the shoe's strengths in performance are offset by its significant sizing limitations. While the customizability is a plus, the need for such modifications and the difficulty in obtaining appropriate sizing in certain regions make it a less-than-ideal choice for many.
